ORDAL SCORE
The project is the PancakeSwap Token (CAKE) on BSC, a DEX-related asset. Evidence is limited: on-chain data shows a large holder base (1.9M), distributed holdings (top 10 non-excluded 3.24%), and a security audit with no honeypot indicator and verified source.
WHY IT SCORED THIS WAY.
The project is the PancakeSwap Token (CAKE) on BSC, a DEX-related asset. Evidence is limited: on-chain data shows a large holder base (1.9M), distributed holdings (top 10 non-excluded 3.24%), and a security audit with no honeypot indicator and verified source. However, the contract is mintable and ownership is active, introducing control risks. A major discrepancy exists: the reported total supply of 5.5B conflicts with PancakeSwap's documented 400M hard cap, which remains unresolved. Social and community evidence is entirely absent, leading to low social scores. The meme dimension is weak due to lack of distinct visual identity or cultural traction. Technology is functional but unoriginal and with low moat. The on-chain score is relatively high (68) due to holder distribution and liquidity, while social is low (15) due to missing data. This divergence is expected as they measure different aspects; the social score reflects absence of evidence, not necessarily absence of community. Confidence is moderate because of the supply cap conflict and missing social verification.
FOR
- 01Large holder base with 1,913,887 holders indicates widespread adoption.+
- 02Top 10 non-excluded wallets hold only 3.24%, suggesting decentralized ownership.+
- 03Liquidity of $6.85M is material for a token, enabling trading.+
- 04Contract source is verified and not a proxy, reducing some technical risks.+
- 05The token serves clear utility within the PancakeSwap ecosystem (governance, staking, launches).+
AGAINST
- 01Reported total supply (5.5B) contradicts documented 400M hard cap, raising serious questions about tokenomics.−
- 02Contract is mintable with active ownership, exposing holders to potential inflation or control actions.−
- 03No social media presence or community evidence was provided, hindering assessment of organic support.−
- 04Meme and cultural strength are minimal, offering little speculative appeal.−
- 05Low liquidity relative to market cap ($6.85M vs $820M) may cause price volatility.−
- MOMENTUM
- UNKNOWN
- ORGANIC
- 0/100
- BOT RISK
- HIGH
- COMMUNITY
- SUSPICIOUS
- — No X handle provided in project identity
- — No social or X evidence supplied in the 3 evidence items
- − Missing X handle and social data
- − No observable engagement or organic signals
- − Unable to assess bot activity or authenticity
- VISUAL
- 10
- RECOGNITION
- 10
- REMIX
- 10
- CULTURE
- 20
- VIRALITY
- 25
UNKNOWN
- + Token symbol 'Cake' offers a basic visual anchor.
- − Lack of distinct visual identity.
- − No verifiable meme origin.
- − Low remixability and cultural persistence.
- − Limited public discussion beyond financial markets.
- − Reliance on utility over cultural engagement.
- PRODUCT REALITY
- 74/100
- INNOVATION
- INCREMENTAL
- TECHNICAL MOAT
- LOW
- GITHUB
- NOT OBSERVED
“The BSC token is named PancakeSwap Token, has symbol CAKE and 18 decimals, with the reported total supply of 5,504,399,103.751051201610995531.”
PARTIALLY SUPPORTEDThe supplied RPC evidence reports this metadata and amount. However, the reported supply is inconsistent with PancakeSwap’s documentation, which says CAKE has a 400 million hard cap. The supplied evidence alone does not explain the discrepancy.
“The CAKE/USDT PancakeSwap pair has the stated price, market cap, liquidity, volume and 24-hour change.”
SUPPORTEDThe supplied DEX evidence reports these figures. They are a snapshot, not independently verified current market data.
“The token has 1,913,887 holders, no honeypot indicator, is mintable, is not a proxy, and is source-verified.”
PARTIALLY SUPPORTEDThese are the findings reported by the supplied GoPlus evidence. A lack of a honeypot indicator is not a general safety guarantee, and this snapshot does not independently establish the contract’s behavior or ownership controls.
- + Identifiable BSC token contract with reported on-chain metadata.
- + Ecosystem documentation describes specific token uses, including governance and CAKE.PAD participation.
- + Supplied security snapshot reports no honeypot indicator and a verified source.
- − Reported total supply conflicts with PancakeSwap documentation’s 400 million hard cap.
- − The token is reported as mintable; supplied evidence does not establish who can mint or under what controls.
- − No GitHub or implementation evidence was supplied, so engineering execution is unassessed.
- − A no-honeypot indicator does not establish broader contract or ecosystem safety.
DATA FIRST.
1,913,887 holders; top 10 non-excluded wallets hold 3.24%; liquidity $6,853,773; ownership active; 3 risk signals detected.
- — Contract ownership is active and can still exercise owner privileges.
- — Token supply can be increased by the owner.
- — Liquidity is low in absolute or relative terms.
Risk signals are indicators derived from public data. They are not accusations of fraud or wrongdoing. Unavailable: holders.top20Percent, holders.devPercent, token.creator, token.contractAgeDays, wallet.snipers, wallet.earlyBuyers, wallet.relatedWallets, contract.maxWallet, contract.maxTx.
WHERE THEY CONFLICT.
“ONCHAIN investigation scores 68/100.”
“SOCIAL investigation scores 15/100.”
ONCHAIN (68) and SOCIAL (15) diverge because they assess different dimensions. ONCHAIN is based on concrete on-chain data: holder distribution, liquidity, and security flags. SOCIAL is based on the complete absence of social evidence; the low score reflects missing information, not negative sentiment. Thus, the divergence is not a contradiction but uneven data coverage. On-chain findings are robust; social assessment is limited and should be interpreted as 'unknown' rather than 'poor'.
FINAL DELIBERATION.
- EVIDENCE REVIEWED
- 4
- CONFLICTS
- 1
- CRITICAL RISKS
- 5
- CONFIDENCE
- 55%
The project is the PancakeSwap Token (CAKE) on BSC, a DEX-related asset. Evidence is limited: on-chain data shows a large holder base (1.9M), distributed holdings (top 10 non-excluded 3.24%), and a security audit with no honeypot indicator and verified source. However, the contract is mintable and ownership is active, introducing control risks. A major discrepancy exists: the reported total supply of 5.5B conflicts with PancakeSwap's documented 400M hard cap, which remains unresolved. Social and community evidence is entirely absent, leading to low social scores. The meme dimension is weak due to lack of distinct visual identity or cultural traction. Technology is functional but unoriginal and with low moat. The on-chain score is relatively high (68) due to holder distribution and liquidity, while social is low (15) due to missing data. This divergence is expected as they measure different aspects; the social score reflects absence of evidence, not necessarily absence of community. Confidence is moderate because of the supply cap conflict and missing social verification.
- — Supply cap discrepancy unresolved.
- — Mintable and owner-controlled contract.
- — Missing social/community evidence.
- — Low liquidity relative to market cap.
- — Weak meme/cultural identity.
INTELLIGENCE BOARD.
Real data. Public sources. Traceable evidence.
Name: PancakeSwap Token. Symbol: Cake. Decimals: 18. Total supply: 5504399103.751051201610995531.
Pair Cake/USDT on pancakeswap. Price $2.44. Market cap $820,011,088. Liquidity $6,853,773. 24h volume $1,020,324. 24h change -2.14%.
1,913,887 holders. No honeypot indicator. Mintable. Not a proxy. Source verified.
PAST VERDICTS ARE NEVER OVERWRITTEN.
First recorded trial for this project. Past verdicts are never overwritten — future trials will appear here as a score history.
ORDAL analyzes publicly available information using automated systems. Results may contain errors or incomplete information. Scores and verdicts are analytical signals, not financial advice.
Browse all trials →